Roxanne Reid - Africa Addict
  • Home
  • Book author
    • Travels in the Kalahari >
      • Photo gallery: Travels in the Kalahari
      • Book reviews: Travels in the Kalahari
    • A Walk in the Park >
      • Photo gallery: A Walk in the Park
      • Book reviews: A Walk in the Park
    • The Essential Guide to Self-Editing >
      • Book reviews: Essential Guide to Self-Editing
    • Betrayed
    • Book reviews online
  • Editing & proofreading
  • In the media
    • Travel features
    • Health features
    • Online media
  • Blog
  • Testimonials
  • Links
  • Contact

Heated over hotels in Kruger National Park

1/4/2011

5 Comments

 
No, it’s not an April Fool’s joke. At least six luxury hotels are planned to be built inside the Kruger National Park ...

This blog post is a little different because we have Niki Moore as a guest blogger… 

Oh dear. Here’s another one of those seemingly unwinnable arguments over the integrity of our tourist attractions, with each side talking right past the other, and each coming from a mutually-exclusive point of view.

The latest brou-haha concerns plans by SANParks to build one, or maybe two, or may be a whole lot, of five-star hotels with conference facilities in the Kruger National Park. They won’t be building it themselves, mind, they are going into partnership with Radisson Blu. One hotel is planned for the Malelane area of the park, and the second in the Skukuza system. These are areas right within the park. They are scheduled to open in 2013.

Let’s begin this debate by looking at the facts.

According to laws governing national parks worldwide, this kind of development simply cannot take place. Therefore in order for the planned hotels to proceed, Kruger will have to be downgraded in the same way that Yellowstone Park in the US is facing a downgrade over excessive development. If the hotel developments go ahead, Kruger will stop being a national park.  

Secondly, apart from laws, guidelines and international classifications, conventional conservation wisdom has accepted that the best development model for any protected area or biosphere would be a core area of complete wilderness. Around this, in various zones on the border of the wilderness, would be areas of high-impact development, middle-impact development, and low-impact development. The best example of this is Pilanesberg Game Reserve. The reason for peripheral development is because rural communities can have a large say in  – and even ownership of  – the adjacent hotels.  Staff accommodation, roads and support infrastructure can also be situated outside the park, making no impact on the wilderness inside. Since around 1957, this has been regarded as best practice.  

Thirdly, with hotels facing hard times all over the world and the conference industry being particularly hard hit – is this is the right time to be building new hotels and conference facilities?  

Conservationists who oppose the hotel developments point out that an environmental impact assessment was only begun six months after the hotels were approved.  This indicates that the park management is determined to build hotels, no matter what.  Fiona McLeod, an excellent investigative journalist with the Mail and Guardian, pointed out in an article that the chairman of the board of SANParks has a vested interest in the Radisson parent company. Many journalists who have asked questions about the development have been put off and the crucial questions, such as ‘Will the law be changed and Kruger downgraded?’, ‘Has a consultation process been undertaken?’ and ‘Are these hotels going to be viable?’ have not been answered.  

Instead, the debate has degenerated into a name-calling us-and-them exercise, which has obscured the real issue and – most unfortunately – made the whole thing appear as an old-guard-white-preservationist-anti-transformation brigade versus the meeting-the-aspirations-of-disadvantaged-poor-blacks new order.

Salomon Joubert, an ex-Kruger warden, started the whole thing off on the wrong foot by defending the spiritual nature of wilderness, saying that conserving pristine wilderness created a sanctuary that was part of the needs of man, and that this was one of the founding philosophies of the park according to Prime Minister-at-the-time Jan Smuts and Kruger’s first chief ranger Hamilton-Stevens.  Kruger CEO David Mabunda replied sniffily to this that the 3 million poor blacks living on the borders of the park don’t give a fig about old-white-men Smuts and Hamilton-Stevens’ spiritual well-being.  (I’m paraphrasing, of course…)  

And unfortunately the debate went down from there.

Both sides are wrong, of course. The old purist ideology of pristine wilderness has long fled from Kruger Park, with its tarred roads and speed traps, bustling rest camps and huge tourist trucks. However, the brand of Kruger as a tourist icon is still priceless and should be preserved – especially in view of the fact that a multi-billion rand safari industry has sprung up on its borders through privately-owned parks and lodges.

No-one can, or should, sit on the fence on this issue. It does appear as if the plan to build the hotels is fatally flawed and might be the thin end of the wedge that finishes off Kruger, but as the SANParks board refuses to answer questions it is hard to get to the real story. And as long as the issue stays at the ‘haves-vs-have-nots’ level, it can only have an unhappy ending for all.

So perhaps one can finish off by saying – ‘Well, what can I do?  I’m just an ordinary oik with no real influence over development or not in the Kruger Park.’

This is wrong – citizen activism has the potential to do great things. People in the hotel industry can express their displeasure towards Radisson Blu; people in the tourist industry can mobilise against supporting the project until questions are answered.  

At the very least we need to know whether the iconic Kruger National Park is about to lose its National Park status to accommodate a few badly-conceived hotels. We need some transparency on this issue – Kruger does, after all, belong to every single South African citizen for now and (most importantly) for the future. 

This article by Niki Moore is reprinted with kind permission of Tourism Update

5 Comments
Andrew Schaffner
1/4/2011 03:58:40 am

I fully agree , in fact I have for the last 20 years or more believed that the Kruger is over commercialised , in 1990 when the first of the bushveld camps were opened , which were far more comfortable than what was originally envisaged .

Reply
Gerhrd Smit
1/4/2011 04:00:21 am

Excellent.
Thanks

Reply
Niki
1/4/2011 04:22:02 am

You, as the consumer, can exert an enormous amount of pressure. If you care about Kruger, why not send a note to the Feedback address of Rezidor Hotels (the developer) at this address http://www.radissonblu.com/feedback and tell them that you will boycott all their properties worldwide unless they abandon plans to build in the Kruger Park. Send this invitation to your entire online network worldwide. I have already let them know that I am a travel writer and will make sure that I never stay at, or promote, a Rezidor Hotel ever again. Let’s see if citizen activism can actually do something!

Reply
Carol
1/4/2011 09:39:24 am

My biggest concern is that once Kruger park as we know it has been destroyed - what is the next step - coal mining for additional income?

Will KTP be next? Like dominoes the disease will spread to line the pockets of the fat cats to the detriment of fauna and flora conservation.

If this travesty is not stopped South Africa will soon be a no go as a tourist destination.

Reply
Michael Brett
1/4/2011 02:14:36 pm

Much of the above is utter rubbish! Pilanesberg receives 33% of Kruger's visitors on 2% of the land area! It simply cannot be used as a comparsion of wonderful peripheral development! Also, Malelane and Skukuza are both on the edge of the park so the argument would therefore support development! Building a game lodge at Malelane or Skukuza, where Kruger die-hards would never stay anyway, will have zero impact on peoplen who love places like Maroela or Punda. And WHERE does the argument for downgrading a antional park come from? There is no international law that governs how many lodges/camps a national parks can support. Some national parks even have mines within their boundaries! The IUCN definitions do not cover this! US parks are established by Congress. NOBODY is about to downgrade Yellowstone!

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Get email links to the latest posts

    Buy my books
    Travels in the Kalahari, amazon.com e-book
    E-book 2012​

    A Walk in the Park, amazon.com e-book
    2nd ed e-book 2015
    The Essential Guide to Self-Editing, amazon.com e-book
    E-book 2017

    About 

    I'm an independent travel writer and book editor with a passion for Africa - anything from African travel, people, safari and wildlife to adventure, heritage, road-tripping and slow travel.
    My travel buddy and husband Keith is the primary photographer for this blog.
    We're happiest in the middle of nowhere, meeting the locals, trying something new, or simply watching the grass grow.
    Use this website to discover new places to go, revisit places you've loved, or take a virtual tour of destinations you only dream about.

    Categories

    All
    Baviaanskloof
    Books
    Botswana
    Camping
    Cape Town
    Chobe
    Conservation
    Drc
    Eastern Cape
    Etosha Namibia
    Food
    Free State
    Garden Route
    Gauteng
    Issues
    Kalahari
    Karoo
    Kenya
    Kruger National Park
    Kwazulu Natal
    Lesotho
    Limpopo
    Linyanti
    Madagascar
    Malawi
    Mozambique
    Mpumalanga
    Namaqualand
    Namibia
    Nature Parks
    Northern Cape
    Okavango
    Overberg
    People
    Photography
    Richtersveld
    Tanzania
    West Coast
    Western Cape
    Wild Creatures
    Zambia
    Zimbabwe

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    January 2010
    November 2009


Copyright © Roxanne Reid - No words or photographs on this site may be used without written permission from roxannereid.co.za

Privacy Policy, GDPR and POPIA compliance
​* We promise that we take data safety seriously and use your private data only to offer a personalised experience
* If you subscribed to our newsletter, you will receive our newsletters. You can always unsubscribe by following the link in email or by emailing us
* If you gave us your name, it will only be used to personalise the newsletters
* We have never sold, we are not selling, and we will not sell any of your personal data provided to us
* The blog uses cookies to track activity. It is anonymous except for telling us your location and what you did on our blog
​
Photos from berniedup, Lucy_Hill